Home » Randomness

Pot calling kettle black 2…

14 March 2007 5 views One Comment

As promised here’s more thoughts…

I think however earlier I completely misunderstood the article in that I assumed it meant creating more nuclear weapons, however reading it I can’t make out if it does involve that or not. However if it does me stating ‘pot calling kettle black’ refers to Britain and the US going up in arms about Iraq and Nuclear weopons and more recently objecting to Korea carrying out a weaopon program whereas (If this is the case) here we are about to make more. It’s hypocritical.

To quote Tony Blair (or perhaps misquote depending if I understood the article or not)

I believe it is important that we recognise that, although it is impossible to predict the future, the one thing… that is certain, is the unpredictability of it.’

I don’t see that having nuclear weopans just in case will help anything other than giving us the power to destroy half the world. I don’t think that nuclear weopons are ever called for, nor any type of bomb, we complain at terrorists for blowing up trains and planes yet all we do is fight fire with fire, I’m sure to many people we are the bigger terrorists as a country.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

One Comment »

  • Dave said:

    i think they are necessary as a deterrent, altho the best form would be for none at all worldwide but this wud be impossible to enforce.

    What about the starswars programme, which can be developed with the aim of shooting down nuclear missiles?

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.